Question

What is intrinsic electric safety?

Can live maintenance be done on intrinsically safe circuit?

Describe intrinsically safe equipment used on board ship.

 

Intrinsic safety (IS) is a protection technique for safe operation of electronic equipment in explosive atmospheres and under irregular operating conditions. The concept was developed for safe operation of process control instrumentation in hazardous areas. As a discipline, it is an application of inherent safety in instrumentation.

 

The theory behind intrinsic safety is to ensure that the available electrical and thermal energy in the system is always low enough that ignition of the hazardous atmosphere cannot occur. This is achieved by ensuring that only low voltages and currents enter the hazardous area, and that all electric supply and signal wires are protected by zener safety barriers. Sometimes an alternative type of barrier known as a galvanic isolation barrier may be used.

 

In normal uses, electrical equipment often creates internal tiny sparks in switches, motor brushes, connectors, and in other places. Such sparks can ignite flammable substances present in air. A device termed intrinsically safe is designed to not contain any components that produce sparks or which can hold enough energy to produce a spark of sufficient energy to cause an ignition. For example, during marine transfer operations when flammable products are transferred between the marine terminal and tanker ships or barges, two-way radio communication needs to be constantly maintained in case the transfer needs to stop for unforeseen reasons such as a spill. The United States Coast Guard requires that the two way radio must be certified as intrinsically safe.

 

Another aspect of intrinsic safety is controlling abnormal small component temperatures. Under certain fault conditions (such as an internal short inside a semiconductor device), the temperature of a component case can rise to a much higher level than in normal use. Safeguards, such as current limiting by resistors and fuses, must be employed to ensure that in no circumstance can a component reach a temperature that could cause autoignition of a combustible atmosphere.

 

No single field device or wiring is intrinsically safe by itself (except for properly designed battery-operated, self contained devices), but is intrinsically safe only when employed in a properly designed IS system. Such systems are usually provided with detailed instructions to ensure safe use.

 

 

An intrinsically safe circuit is one that is designed for a power so low that any spark or thermal effect produced by it, whether there is a fault or not, is incapable of igniting the surrounding flammable gas or vapour. It follows that intrinsically safe equipment is used in such circuits and is designed on the same basis, i.e. of being unable to produce a spark with enough power to ignite the specific flammable vapour or gas involved. Intrinsic safety technique requires not only that a system is designed for operation with very low power, but also that it is made invulnerable to high external energies and other effects.

 

If a fault can adversely affect the safety of the equipment it is called a ‘countable’ fault. The situation is further complicated because the apparatus standard permits some specially designed components to be regarded as infallible and some inadequately designed features to be failed in normal operation. Consequently there are faults that are not considered to happen, faults, which are counted, and faults, which are imposed but not counted.

 

One of the major advantages of intrinsic safety is that ‘live maintenance’ on equipment is permitted without the necessity of obtaining ‘gas clearance’ certificates. A consequence of this is that during the safety analysis the possibility of open circuiting and short-circuiting any field wiring is regarded as normal operation. Fortunately understanding the apparatus standard and faults is only necessary for apparatus designers and certifying authorities. The apparatus certificates remove the necessity to consider faults, except for field wiring faults, in system design.

 

The ability to do live maintenance on an intrinsically safe system is a major benefit of the technique. It is difficult to test an instrument system with the power removed, and difficult to obtain a meaningful ‘gas clearance certificate’ that covers the whole of the area affected by a system. Consequently live working is very desirable. There are however factors, other than gas ignition, that have to be considered whenever an instrument system is taken out of commission and consequently local safety practices such as ‘permits to work’ have still to be observed.

 

Permitted practices on the plant

The design of intrinsically safe apparatus and systems ensures that the short circuit and open circuit of field wiring cannot cause ignition of a gas atmosphere. The concept of live maintenance uses this feature but does not extend to carrying out detailed repairs; for example, repairing printed circuit boards within the hazardous areas. In practice, the permissible actions are restricted by the available tools hence deciding what is permissible is not difficult. IEC 60079-17 restricts live ‘working’ to:

i) Disconnection of, and removal or replacement of electrical apparatus and cabling

ii) Adjustment of any controls which is necessary for the calibration of the electrical apparatus or system

iii) Removal and replacement of any plug in components or assemblies

iv) Use of any test instruments specified in the relevant documentation. Where test instruments are not specified in the relevant documentation, only those instruments, which do not affect the intrinsic safety of the circuit, may be used

v) Any other maintenance activity specifically permitted by the “relevant documentation”

These requirements are in line with the normal practice of maintenance on field mounted equipment and hence create no problem. Work on associated safe area apparatus, such as the intrinsically safe interface is restricted in the same way, except that there is greater freedom to operate on the safe area terminals.

Recently developed interfaces tend to operate from 24V supplies and there is no risk of electrocution. However it is not unusual for interfaces with relay outputs to be switching higher voltages, which may create a significant shock risk. Where this risk occurs, adequate warning labels are required and the relevant precautions should be taken during the maintenance process. There is no risk of a significant electric shock being received by a technician working on an intrinsically safe circuit. There is a hypothetical possibility but in practice this is not a real problem actions are permitted, they are frequently embodied in the apparatus certificate and manufacturer’s instruction. This information should be made available to the relevant technician on the work sheet, as he is not likely to have ready access to the certificate and/or instructions. The apparatus marking would carry the ubiquitous ‘X’ marking but this is almost universally applied and consequently largely ignored.

 

Permitted practice in the workshop

The repair and testing of intrinsically safe and associated apparatus should only be carried out in favourable conditions and by adequately trained technicians. The IEC standard IEC 60079-19 provides some guidance on the approach to repair of intrinsically safe equipment. There are always practical and economic limitations on what is practicable. For example, shunt diode safety barriers are invariably encapsulated and not repairable. Isolating interfaces are usually in boxes that are difficult to open, coated in varnish and impossible to test in detail without specialist test equipment and knowledge of the circuit. In general replacement by an identical unit is preferred for both economic and safety reasons. Some repairs can be carried out without affecting the safety of equipment and, usually, it is obvious what limitations apply. For example, damage to enclosures does not usually directly affect the intrinsic safety of apparatus and consequently a repair which restores the enclosure to its original level of integrity (IP rating) is acceptable. The repair of printed circuit boards is sometimes considered but is usually impracticable. Removing components without damaging the board is difficult, repairing the coating on reassembly is messy and maintaining the original creepage and clearance distances may not be possible. A recent further complication is that if lead free solder has been used, the use of solder containing lead usually results in unsatisfactory joints. A record of any repairs should be maintained. The use of before and after photographs (stored digitally) frequently simplifies the process.

 

 

Intrinsically safe apparatus is currently made to two standards of safety. Ex i(a) is the symbol for the higher standard, which requires that safety is maintained with up to two faults. This type of equipment can be fitted in any hazardous area. The other standard is given the symbol Ex i(b) and apparatus made to this specification is safe with up to one fault. The Ex i(b) products are not used in the most hazardous areas. Manufacturers of intrinsically safe apparatus state that this method of protection is suitable for electrical supplies at less than 30 volts and 50 milliamps. It is used extensively for instrumentation and some control functions.

Care is exercised in design that capacitance and inductance within the electrical installation are kept to a minimum, to prevent storage of energy which in the event of a fault could generate an incendive spark. Ex i systems are isolated from other electrical supplies even to the extent that the cables are not permitted to be in the same trays as those of other cables (to prevent induction effects). Systems are earthed and protection is provided by inclusion of shunt diode safety barriers between hazardous and non-hazardous areas (Figure). The safety barriers have current-limiting resistors and voltage bypassing zener diodes to prevent excessive electrical energies from reaching the hazardous areas.

Neither certification nor marking is necessary if none of the following values are exceeded in a device: 1.2 V, 0.1 A, 20 micro joules, 25 milli watts. However, great caution is needed when deciding whether apparatus will operate within all of these limits and any associated system would have to be certified as intrinsically safe.

 

Figure Safety barrier for Ex i equipment